7 School Rules in Other Countries That Americans Would Find Absurd

1. No Shoes Allowed in Japan

Shutterstock

In Japan, it’s considered improper to wear shoes inside schools, and this rule extends to almost every building, from homes to offices. Students change into indoor slippers before entering the classroom, and they must leave their outdoor shoes at the door. This practice is believed to keep classrooms clean and to promote hygiene, something that is deeply ingrained in Japanese culture. For American students, the idea of going shoeless in class might seem odd, especially when they’re used to wearing their favorite sneakers throughout the school day.

While this rule is meant to keep things tidy and foster respect for the space, the thought of changing shoes every time you enter a building may feel excessive. For many Americans, the act of slipping off one pair of shoes to put on another may seem time-consuming and unnecessary. It’s a small but significant difference in how schools approach cleanliness and personal comfort.

2. The “Silent Lunch” Rule in South Korea

Shutterstock

In some South Korean schools, students have a rule where they must eat lunch in complete silence. This tradition is meant to encourage focus and respect for the meal, allowing students to reflect on their food and their day. Teachers enforce this rule strictly, and it’s seen as a time for students to eat without the distractions of talking or socializing. For Americans, the idea of eating lunch in silence could feel unnatural, especially in schools where lunchtime is a social affair.

American schools typically encourage talking with friends during lunch, making it a time for students to unwind and catch up. The “silent lunch” rule might be perceived as harsh in the U.S., where students often bond over shared meals and conversations. However, for South Koreans, it’s a cultural practice that ties into broader values of mindfulness and discipline.

3. Wearing Uniforms in the UK

Shutterstock

In the United Kingdom, it’s common for students to wear uniforms to school, regardless of whether they are in public or private schools. The uniforms typically consist of blazers, trousers or skirts, and ties, often in the school’s specific colors and patterns. Many American students, who enjoy the freedom of choosing their outfits each day, might find the idea of wearing the same clothes every day restrictive. The uniform policy is designed to promote equality by minimizing visible signs of social class differences among students.

For Americans, the concept of uniforms can seem old-fashioned, especially in schools that embrace a casual dress code. While some see the uniform as a way to level the playing field, others argue that it stifles individuality. In the U.S., the dress code debate is often centered around finding a balance between comfort and expression, making the British uniform policy feel quite foreign.

4. Strict Hair Regulations in France

Shutterstock

In France, school rules around hairstyles are surprisingly strict. Students are expected to keep their hair neatly groomed, with some schools even dictating the length and style of hair for both boys and girls. Long hair for boys, for example, may not be permitted in certain schools, and colorful or extreme hairstyles are often frowned upon. For Americans, where personal expression through hair is often seen as a way to define one’s identity, these restrictions would likely seem excessive.

In the U.S., students typically have the freedom to express themselves through their hair, with only limited rules around things like headwear or extreme hairstyles. The idea of restricting hairstyles as part of a school dress code may feel restrictive in a society where individuality is celebrated. In France, however, the emphasis on discipline and conformity in schools often extends to appearance, making this rule a symbol of order.

5. Mandatory Military Drills in Singapore

Shutterstock

In Singapore, secondary school students are required to participate in mandatory military drills, which are part of the country’s national defense education. This practice aims to instill discipline and prepare students for their future roles in the nation’s defense forces. For American students, the thought of having to take part in military drills as part of their education would likely be shocking, given the separation of military training from public schooling in the U.S.

While Americans may have some exposure to military-related activities through programs like Junior ROTC, compulsory drills are not a standard part of the school experience. The idea of mandatory military training for all students might be seen as an overreach in a country where education is typically focused on academic development. In Singapore, however, it’s viewed as a necessary step toward building national unity and readiness.

6. No Tech in Finnish Classrooms

Shutterstock

Finnish schools are renowned for their education system, which often minimizes the use of technology in the classroom. Unlike in many American schools, where tablets and laptops are commonly used for learning, Finnish classrooms tend to focus more on traditional teaching methods, such as discussion and hands-on activities. Students spend less time on devices, which some believe fosters deeper learning and more meaningful social interactions.

For American students, the absence of technology might seem like a step backward. With tech integrated into almost every aspect of life in the U.S., many would find it hard to imagine a school day without devices like iPads or smartboards. In Finland, however, the focus is on quality over quantity, encouraging personal interaction and creative problem-solving instead of relying on digital tools.

7. School Bans on Chewing Gum in Australia

Pexels

In Australia, many schools have a strict ban on chewing gum. This rule exists for a couple of reasons: it’s thought to reduce littering and prevent the gum from ending up stuck to desks or floors. For American students, where chewing gum is often a norm in school and even encouraged by some teachers as a way to focus, the idea of a no-gum rule can be hard to understand. The rule may seem overbearing, especially since gum is often seen as a harmless distraction.

In the U.S., gum is a typical part of school life, and while some schools have restrictions, the idea of an outright ban seems extreme. Many American students might find it absurd that something as simple as chewing gum could be grounds for disciplinary action. However, in Australia, the ban is taken seriously, with schools opting for a cleaner, more orderly environment where gum is seen as a nuisance rather than a perk.

Scroll to Top